CAMELIA BECIU COMUNICARE SI DISCURS MEDIATIC PDF

“Prin codri de simboluri petrece omu-n viaţă / Şi toate-l cercetează c-un ochi prietenesc.” (Man walks BECIU, Camelia, , Comunicare şi discurs mediatic. Camelia Beciu states that any “electoral debate (or any other mediatic product) is a relevant .. BECIU, Camelia, , Comunicare şi discurs mediatic. Camelia BECIU (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, .. Revista română de comunicare ºi relaţii publice si la notion d’identité est une ressource pour la compréhension conceptuelle et empirique de la diaspora. Acest studiu explorativ investighează construcţia, prin discursul mediatic.

Author: Bazil Gozilkree
Country: Somalia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 11 April 2006
Pages: 242
PDF File Size: 16.91 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.65 Mb
ISBN: 695-6-56093-908-8
Downloads: 74736
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tygojinn

Although the mediatic discourse exploits first of all the spectacular dimension of the debate, one should not neglect the generative dimension of this discursive genre. Only in the case of the opposition candidate, Klaus Iohannis, during the second debate, the relationship between the three discursive functions is consistent with the first hypothesis: The structure of main topics by discursive functions, in the first debate 11 NovemberRealitatea TV.

The third section contains research methodology. This article is based on the premise that televised political debates are conflictual, competitive verbal interactions. The solution of the dialogue as a meeting point of identities, as a primordial social practice [2]comes naturally.

In the second debate, Victor Ponta has slightly increased his enunciations on general objectives 5 to 1 and future plans 6 to 4in comparison with the first debate. Enunciations in the second debate 12 NovemberB1TV.

Registration units were considered assertions, claims, statements, and arguments of candidates themesand each theme was coded for one out of the three discursive functions: From this point of view, the candidate in power at that time, Victor Ponta, was worse placed than his opponent, Klaus Iohannis.

Enunciations in the first debate 11 NovemberRealitateaTV. The structure of main topics by discursive functions, in the second debate 12 NovemberB1 TV.

The defensive enunciations of Victor Ponta focused on his past actions 40 and on his personal character 18 in the first debate; decreasing in frequency during the second debate 27 on past actions. Televised debates are the opportunity that politicians can mediwtic to return to the interiority where they had been apparently thrown from.

  EL LENGUAJE DE LA VISION GYORGY KEPES PDF

presidential debate | Cultures Of Communication – Cultures de la Communication

These data show that Victor Ponta looked for an improvement in his discursive strategy from the first to the second debate. The three types of discursive interventions may be slightly operationalized and defined in multiple languages and cultures.

The data show that the candidate who was already in power Victor Ponta prime-minister at that time used the defense strategy more often than the opposition candidate Klaus Iohannis, in both debates: Table 2 shows how the situation has changed during the second debate, when Victor Ponta attacked more Starting from this premise, a functional approach to analyze political debates appears appropriate.

His state of exteriority is a fall to great esteem.

The chi-square test calculated for the three types of discursive functions shows significant differences in the way the two candidates used those functions in the two debates: Dialogue means, on the contrary, availability, opening. It makes you melt inside it. And he has to do something about this situation.

presidential debate

Second, defensive enunciations may create the impression that a candidate is reactive, rather than proactive. The three discursive functions are mutually stimulated and conditioned Benoit and Wells, In the metabolism of debate we can see discursive behaviour models that generalise in the verbal interactions in the public space.

The fourth hypothesis was confirmed as well by our data.

cimunicare However, the present disckrs, but other studies conducted in Europe, such as the study of Isotalus in connection with the debates in Finland, do not fully confirm the assumptions of functional theory.

Persuasive attack camelja defence in the presidential debatesTuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press. The last part of the paper is dedicated to conclusions. And then you have to do something. Candidates set up desirability are positioned on a preference scale by three discursive functions: Table 5 and Table 6 present results from the testing of the third hypothesis. This paper proposes an analysis of televised debates for presidential elections in Romania, in Novemberfrom the perspective of functional theory of political campaign discourse.

The three discursive functions we discussed above were grouped around two main themes: It takes away your portrait. Vote is a comparative act; Candidates should distinguish themselves from other opponents; Political campaign messages allow candidates to distinguish neciu from others to assert their identity.

  ASTROM WITTENMARK COMPUTER CONTROLLED SYSTEMS PDF

Note here that Klaus Iohannis is currently the president of Romania. The particular mode in which social players use the three discursive functions in the debate can be used by voters to decide which of the candidates is preferred.

We depart from Benoit hypothesis regarding functions of the discourse in political campaigns:. The general objectives are invoked more to the acclaim than in the attacks. Digi24, August 2, The paper examines the way in which social actors position themselves discursively during final debates for presidential elections, both one toward the other, and toward the content of communication, from the perspective of functional theory of political campaign discourse.

comunicarf

political communication culture

In the next section we present a brief introduction to the functional theory of political discourse as strategic positioning of social actors in the semiotic act of televised debate. The functional analysis of political discourse can be regarded as an instrument that helps us diagnose the discursive behavior of social actors during televised debates, the civilisation of dialogue in the local political life.

Ipoteze si ipostaze Discourse Analysis. The descending order in the distribution of frequencies was maintained in the second debate as well: For politicians such an effort is even more necessary, more relevant.

All five predictions of functional theory were tested in the two televised debates for presidential elections in Romania: Related to the first discursive function — acclamation — we observe that during the first debate, candidates have used acclamation in relatively equal proportions The fifth hypothesis was partially confirmed.

These topics, formulated as attacks, have caused numerous defensive enunciations from his opponent, Victor Ponta.

From this standpoint, the functional theory of political discourse can be regarded as strategic positioning of social actors semiotic practices in the semiotic act of televised debate. Dialogue is not possible in whatever conditions, and we, in Romania, today, should know it too well.

VPN