Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science de Natalie Angier Compra hasta el 20 y recíbelo para Navidad con Envío 1 día, GRATIS con Prime .. “Natalie Angier provides a masterful, authoritative synthesis of the state of. Natalie Angier is an American nonfiction writer and a science journalist for The New York Times Video: Natalie Angier – The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science (May 16, Panel discussion with Neil Turok, Michael D. Griffin, Nadia El-Awady and Stewart Brand, at the Quantum to Cosmos festival. Natalie Angier (16 de febrero de Bronx, Nueva York) es una escritora y periodista de temas científicos ganadora de Premio Pulitzer; activista pública por el Vídeo: Natalie Angier – The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of.

Author: Dojar Jutaur
Country: Canada
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 25 August 2015
Pages: 206
PDF File Size: 19.70 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.46 Mb
ISBN: 125-2-88392-734-1
Downloads: 16921
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tunris

Sometimes the best explainers of a topic are outsiders or laymen, rather than practitioners in the field. Starting with the idea that ‘the best way natlaie teach science to non-scientists is to go for depth over breadth’, Angier’s research takes her to numerous leaders in their field to find out what they wish people better understood. East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. It’s alluring, exciting even, to be shown ‘the fairy tales of sciences that happen to be true’.

Customers who viewed this item also viewed. The Origin of the Universe. Start reading The Canon on your Kindle in under a minute.

After reading this chapter it seemed like a veil lifted from my eyes, and I got excited and yelled, “I get it! There are further successes elsewhere. It’s all very promising, but The Canon is a narrative of promise unfulfilled.

There’s a problem loading this menu right now. Science cannot be accessed in this way. Still, The Canon makes a valiant attempt.

The Canon: The Beautiful Basics of Science – Natalie Angier – Google Livres

Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. I angiee excited to read it since I definitely don’t have a healthy grasp on science.


She would be talking about Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. This book provides and starting point for the adult whose interest has been rekindled.

In the end, I still think she didn’t quite simplify some of the xe concepts to a level I was really comfortable with. Cahon a customer review. Why is it that worldly Manhattan sophisticates feel a working knowledge of the arts is a prerequisite for a fulfilled existence, but that the sciences are irrelevant, something for nerdy adults with no social skills to obsess about? See all reviews. As the book went on, however, I began to get frustrated.

Natalie Angier

Kindle Edition Verified Purchase. This needn’t be a bad thing, but the writer’s presentation is meandering and counterproductive. If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?

Customers who bought this item also bought.

Excellent book for anyone who was interested in science as a child and had it slowly leached out of them by the public school system. Buy the selected items together This item: Angier proves a rabble-rousing, wisecracking, deeply committed tour guide in her irresistible exploration of the scientific process and the basic concepts of physics, chemistry, evolutionary biology, cellular and molecular biology, geology, and astronomy. Read reviews that mention natalie angier evolutionary biology high school basics of science beautiful basics writing style scientific method molecular biology whirligig tour subject matter geology and astronomy bill bryson physics chemistry thinking scientifically tour of the beautiful new york york times biology geology short history every sentence.

Understanding how things work feels good. Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. It takes the doctrinaire sloth of the second law of thermodynamics, the tendency of every system to get frowzier over time, and hammers it into a magic, all-purpose, purpose-making machine that turns around and breaks entropy at the knees.

Jokes are built into almost every paragraph and their structure, usually a series of serious scenarios followed by a comical one, is tiresome. But then, enticing though the premise was, it was flawed. I don’t want to be driven off by cute. All My Sons Penguin Classics. As the concepts dealt with became more complex, her penchant for the poetic was really irritating.


If any book can help the public learn to love science, this is it. Atoms, molecules, space, energy, evolution Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? The premise of The Canon, illustrated by the author’s sister cancelling her children’s science museum membership as they reach adolescence, is that there is an imbalance to be redressed.

Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals. The writing is breezy and not stilted, using metaphors instead of math to explain difficult topics.

Science maintains its outsider status not by means of a conspiracy against its nerdiness, but because, as its advocate readily enthuses, it is big, unwieldy, impossible to pin down. Angier argues that science is for sophisticates and then spends an entire book dressing it up in silly clothes to make it more palatable. One person found this helpful. Explore the Home Gift Guide.

Follow the Author

It could make the country smarter. However, probably not a book for someone who has seen their way through less flowery, more information dense tomes.

The folksy humour and the optimistic, upbeat delivery are perhaps just a manifestation of native style in what is a very American book; in fact The Canon is at its most successful when natlie is in the foreground. Rather than just give the equation and tell what the variables mean to me a wonderful way to understand how astronomy intersects historical cnaonthe author mentions, almost off-handedly, a few of the variables and then only really explains the last one.

Not only is this annoying, it is self-defeating.