In Homo Sacer, Giorgio Agamben suggests that Herman’s Melville’s ‘Bartleby the Scrivener’ offers the ‘strongest objection against the principle of sovereignty’. As Agamben sees it, refugees pose a limit to the political categories of Melville’s famous story “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” which is a recurrent. From Giorgio Agamben’s Potentialities. The Scribe, or On Creation 1. The Byzantine lexicon Suda describes Aristotle this way: “Aristotle was.

Author: Yomuro Voodootilar
Country: Dominica
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 3 October 2011
Pages: 352
PDF File Size: 17.31 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.99 Mb
ISBN: 541-6-30197-775-3
Downloads: 71239
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vugami

The aporia here is that the highest thought can neither think nothing or think something, or remain potential or become actual. Since truth is what is at stake in them, they are beyond truth.

When Ibn Arabi worked out his The Illuminations of Meccahe wrote a chapter on the science of letters, about their hierarchy and relations to divine names. His potentiality is not unrealized because of a lack of will. The indifference of Being and Nothing is not, however, an equivalence between two opposite principles; rather, it is the mode of Being of potentiality that is agxmben of all reason.

By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. It is a standard view that the three monotheistic religions believe in a creation from nothing. AgambenThe Experiment, or On Decreation 1.

Hence it does not even want what it desires; there is no reason for it want one thing rather than another. All potential to be or to do something is agamnen the potential to not be or do something, and without this, all potentiality would be indistinguishable from actuality. Maimonides argued for the truth of creation ex nihilo in in Guide for the Perplexed.

The other possibility is that if God were capable of not getting what he wants, then he would be capable of non-Being, which introduces nihilism into God: Traditionally, these problems are tempered by two principles. Aristotle said the intellect was intelligible, but it cannot be intelligible in the way that other objects are because it is not a thing: The formula is repeated so often that it ruins any relation between absolute and ordered potential.


The best agambeh all possible worlds projects an infinite shadow downward, which bartleyb lower and lower to the extreme universe—which even celestial beings cannot comprehend—in which nothing is compossible with anything else and nothing can take place.

There are two possibilities.

Literature and Philosophy: Deleuze, Agamben and Rancière reading Melville’s “Bartleby”.

In book Lambda of the MetaphysicsAristotle deals with these questions: Remembrance is about potentiality. AgambenThat line baartleby a modification of Romans 7: The Bartleby twist on the principle of sufficient reason is: The falasifa were concerned with the principles by which the possible, existing in the mind of God, does or does not actualize in the creative act.

In his work on De animaAlbert the Great agreed with Averroes who made the potential intellect common to all humans.

So thought is linked to the act of writing. The falasifain contrast, remained true to Aristotle: You are commenting using your Facebook account. Agamben is so enamored with the scrivener that he forgets about the story. The experience of potentiality is only possible if it is also the potential not to do, be, or think—if the tablet is capable of not being written on.

On the other hand, there is also a Jewish polemic against the idea, attributed to philosophers, that it is impossible for God to have created the world from nothing accord to the principle from nothing nothing comes.


Bartleby, Refugee, Sovereignty

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Agamben5. You Might Also Like. Zgamben Scribe, or On Creation 1. In that concrete sense, a renewed sovereignty may be a better place to start than no sovereignty at all.

For Arabi, the science of letters marks the passage from the inexpressible to the expressible, or from potentiality to actuality. We need to see which laws govern the transition from the possible to the real, or what causes potentiality to exist. But likewise, to hold to Being and necessary positivity is also difficult; it always has a complicity with this nihilism.

A fourteenth century Oxford agambdn, Richard Fitzralph, said: In the same way, it is through a single intuition or bartleb single science that he knows that contraries do not exist together and that, nevertheless, they are known together in the same cognitive act, which is one single act.

Bartleby, Refugee, Sovereignty – The Philosophical Salon

It is this supremacy of will over potentiality that Bartleby throws in agamnen. The image is ambiguous, and this ambiguity no doubt contributed to its widespread success. Letters represent the material vehicle through which the word of God incarnates itself in created things. Or in other words, how can a blank writing tablet impress upon itself?

In contrast, the Cabalists say that the matter creation presupposes is divine bartleeby is a darkness in God from which the Nothing is eternally produced. The Formula, or On Potentiality 1. Home About Contact Us.

However, potentiality is the most difficult thing to think.