Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.

Author: Arashidal Modal
Country: Kuwait
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 8 November 2018
Pages: 400
PDF File Size: 13.5 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.51 Mb
ISBN: 748-1-17507-774-3
Downloads: 98672
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dokasa

We should keep a good view Husn Zann about all the companions and leave the matter of their internal disputes of Allah. Regards Respected Sister Wa alaikum us salam tarsekhi Rahmatullah The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work.

Tabari is available on the following link. So why should we accept narrations from such people who portray a bad picture of such personalities?

Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani |

Respected Sister Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah The views muawiua in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work. Although mistakes at individual capacity was possible but how could you believe that all companions committed a great crime collectively while the evidence against them is nothing except statements of a few people whose reliability is already under question?

And he did so and the result was in the form of ” Waqia Karbala”. However, information available through Tawatur is something different and exceptional. New articles and books are added this website on 1 st of each month.

Nobody engages in a revolt with a handful of companions including his family members and young children. Dear Tarsekhi Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah Thank you very much for answering me. Details of this procedure are available here: Recently, a group of Arab scholars named BarzanjiHallaqZia al- U’mri and Khalil have conducted that evaluation and found that large number of reports in this book are fake. They will be highly appreciated. If the matter is not much disturbing, I’ll urge you to leave the matter to Allah.


Send at mubashirnazir gmail. Although we are not sure about authenticity of such reports. Rest of the books are written on the basis of his compilation.

I agree with you that narrations from such people should not be accepted in other matters even it is in yareekhi of our view. We should consider the following facts about these issues: I’m not in a position to do so.

This is the history and it cant be denied. Because in this way you can say that Zia- ul-Haq ruled for 11 years because he was a very patient person. The length of ruling period is not a sign of patients. It is also reported in some tareekgi that he changed his decision once he found that a rule has already been established there.

Allah, in the name of, the Most Affectionate, the Tareekyi Merciful. The book is available muqwiya the following links: Similarly, facts related to assassination of Bin Laden are also disputed.

When the matter is only an issue of doubtful reports, why should we form our opinions based on them. If you know Arabic, you should study the history from its original source. If someone blames our father, should we accept his accusations without any assessment?

We are free to form opinions within this life. You tareekh download and see through the chapters related to the years ranging from 30 to 65H. It is completely wrong to consider Hazrat Mu’awiya as the person who transformed Khilafat into Malukiyat.


When I conducted such research, I found that almost all reports containing negative information about such companions was reported by one or more of the five narrators mentioned above. I appreciate that you study the history. You can take each narration one by one and see the biographies of their narrators compiled amedr the scholars of Hadith.

Why should we not do so in this case and leave the matter to Allah for such people who passed away a long time before us and we do not have reliable information available to put a charge against them.

We cannot say about a theory that “it definitely has happened. Other than that, there is nothing except theories of different people. He only compiled the traditions and did not perform evaluation of such reports.

Hazrat Ameer Muawiyah Aur Tarikhi Haqaiq By: Mufti Taqi Usmani

I read the amere thoroughly but I am sorry instead of making me satisfy it has made me more doubtful. Why should we rely on secondary sources?

But the truth is truth. You can check by yourselves in the “History of Tabari ” that all reports portraying a sleazy haqaqi of the companions are reported by only five persons and all of them are considered as “liars “. I’ll advise you to study that procedure and apply that on the original source of all historical narrations compiled by Tabari. If you study the history of Tabari for such years, you’ll find people in the Sanad of all negative reports about the companions.

Therefore, the issue becomes extremely grave.