DODAF 2.0 PDF
DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense that provides structure.
|Published (Last):||25 September 2016|
|PDF File Size:||10.89 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.84 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. Selecting Architecture Viewpoints carefully ensures that the views adequately frame concerns, e.
Employing MagicDraw in DoDAF promotes significant improvement in processes, program and people efficiencies as well as shorter cycle times. The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.
The Operational Viewpoint now can describe rules and constraints for any function business, intelligence, warfighting, etc. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.
These key support processes are designed to provide uniform, mandated, processes in critical decision-making areas, supplemented by individual agency operations, defined by Architectural Descriptions tailored to support those decisions-making requirements.
The sequence of 20 artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets dodaaf practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.
DoDAF Architecting Overview – AcqNotes
These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. The support for the Key Processes is for the information requirements that were presented at the workshops for the key processes and, as such, do not reflect all of the information requirements that a key process could need.
The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.
Rapidly see and identify data relationships and critical paths. The tool automates and assists the process of resource allocation ensuring mission critical project success.
The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness. No Magic also leads the industry in usability and interoperability, ensuring that you avoid unnecessary cost, schedule and performance risk. The new Standards Viewpoint can now describe business, commercial, and doctrinal standards, as well as the technical standards applicable to our solutions, which may include systems and services.
The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. Retrieved from ” https: Benefits Improved Mission Results – Your team will do a better job of mining available data, measuring and visualizing architecture and overall success factors resulting in improved mission results.
The architect and stakeholders select views to ensure that the Architectural Descriptions will support current and future states of the process or activity under review.
Government and Defense – UPDM, DoDAF , MODAF, and NAF
Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. Systems and services view SV is a set of eodaf and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. The OV dodad textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.
This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat As illustrated below, the original viewpoints Operational Viewpoint, Systems and Services Viewpoint, Technical Standards Viewpoint, and the All Viewpoint have had their Models reorganized to better address their purposes.
Government and Defense
In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.
In other projects Wikimedia Commons. The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.
Information about how aspects of the enterprise are connected e. The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. Overview Product Offerings Professional Services. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description.
The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort. In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories.
It establishes a basis for semantic i.
Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. In April the Version 1.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
In most cases, an enterprise will capture its routine or repeatable business and mission operations as architectural content.
In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items dodwf among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.
Architectural support to PfM tends to focus on the investment decision itself although not exclusivelyand assists in justifying investments, evaluating the risk, and providing a dodwf gap analysis. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public dodac voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.
PfM uses the Architectural Description to analyze decisions on fielding or analysis of a needed capability. One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest.