FAKING IT MOCK-DOCUMENTARY AND THE SUBVERSION OF FACTUALITY PDF
This book offers the first major study of mock-documentary. The authors examine the relatively new form along with the association between factual codes and. Jane Roscoe and Craig Hight, Faking It: Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Faking It: Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality. Russell Campbell. Uploaded by. Russell Campbell. Campbell, Russell. “Faking It.
|Published (Last):||10 February 2008|
|PDF File Size:||17.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.78 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
They begin their argument by establishing what they mean by factual discourse, its assumptions and expectations and the tensions in what they call the genre of documentary. For the authors a mock-documentary is a fictional film or television text which mimics the visual and aural conventions of the documentary in order to challenge the very foundations and privileged status of the documentary form.
Faking It: Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality
Manchester University Press Amazon. David McGowan added it Mock-dlcumentary 17, Bes marked it as to-read Jan 14, Request a Review or Inspection Copy. Andrea Springer marked it as to-read Mar 04, Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources.
X Cookies We would like to place cookies on your computer to improve your viewing experience and help us make this website better. Open Preview See a Problem? Add both to Cart Add both to List. Trivia About Faking It: Recent transformations of the documentary genre 3.
Mock-rocumentary first major study of mock-documentary – one of a number of screen forms that play with the assumed boundaries between ‘fact’ and ‘fiction’.
Factual discourse and the cultural placing of documentary. I’d like to read this book on Kindle Don’t have a Kindle? Mike added it Jun 08, Buy Factuaity to this title.
Faking It: Mock-Documentary and the Subversion of Factuality
Return to Book Page. Mark Barber marked it as to-read Apr 02, Whatever turns out to be the case, this analysis of the form provides a useful discussion of the critique and subversion of subversipn provided by mock-documentary which, in itself, is a positive contribution to the developing theorisation of documentary, especially as, in this case, it is presented in a manner accessible to readers with little or no background in documentary theory.
Published February 8th by Manchester University Press. Manchester University Press- Performing Arts – pages. A suggested genealogy 6.
Carina De Santiago rated it it was amazing Jul 13, Jan Czech marked it as to-read Oct 16, Yu Li added it Dec 22, Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality. Indeed, in setting the context for its development, they provide much that is of value to readers who may not tje a specific interest in mock-documentary.
Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Phillip William rated it did not like it Jun 18, F Is For Phony: Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals. The war that won’t die.
Catalog Record: Faking it : mock-documentary and the | Hathi Trust Digital Library
Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. Part of a wider discussion of the increasingly fragile association between factual codes and conventions and the discourses which underpin the documentary genre.
Shuangshuang Huo rated it liked it May 19, Opens out this relatively new media form and by doing so throws light on the status of the documentary itself. In this comprehensive discussion Roscoe and Hight do all of these things. Get to Know Us. The first major study ane mock-documentary – one of a number of screen forms that play with the assumed boundaries between ‘fact’ and ‘fiction’.
Books by Craig Hight.
Situating the mock-documentary 4. There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
To ask other readers questions about Faking Itplease sign up. Konstantina rated it really liked it Sep 01, Jane Jackson added it Mar 04, Discover Prime Book Box for Kids.